The Revolution has Already Begun - But Will It Be Enough?

A right-wing wave is fighting to revitalize the west and restore our civilization to prosperity - but is it already too late?

As it has since it took the crown from the British Empire as the dominant force in western civilization, America is once again leading the way in its attempt to restore western nations to the cohesive, prosperous societies they once were. This surge of right-wing populism aims to bring western culture back to its heights - the kind of heights that history has shown can only be achieved from a society that has deeply engrained and shared values to unite them.

Donald Trump and his administration, though certainly not perfect, are fighting to restore America's borders and expel what can only accurately be described as invaders from their ranks, while also dealing with left-wing extremism which has ramped up its violent streak to a fever pitch, as anyone who hasn't been living under a rock the last few weeks would know.

While America tackles its problems from the top-down and has a ways to go, the rest of western civilization is in far-worse shape.

Outside of Poland, which is virtually the only nation in Europe that had the sense to secure its borders and has refused to accept millions of "migrants" who are hostile to western ideals and our way of life, Europe (along with Canada) has descended into a pitiful shell of its former self.

Once upon a time, the majority of immigrants to the west either came from backgrounds with similar values, or wanted to come to the west in order to adopt those values, recognizing the opportunity to create a better life for their families and understanding the value in western ideals.

Now? They spit on the flags of the countries that give them such opportunities, while waving the flags of countries they don't want to live in.

Millions of migrants from third-world countries have invaded western countries across the board. This "welcomed" invasion has overwhelmed public services, crippled economies and housing markets, and stolen trillions in taxpayer money while the vast majority of "asylum seekers" and "migrants" from the past decade actively do their best to transform once-prosperous nations into the shit-holes those same "asylum seekers" and "migrants" supposedly "fled" from.

Violent crime, particularly crimes against women and children such as sexual assault and rape, have exploded in communities that were once considered safe, while corrupt and ideologically captured judges and lawmakers do their best to protect the criminals rather than the victims.

It's gotten to the point of incredulity - in the UK, thousands of Brits are being arrested and charged every year for posting or saying something "offensive", meanwhile reports emerged from within their own government documenting that hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of young women and girls had been raped and trafficked by Middle Eastern "grooming gangs" over the last few decades, with law enforcement turning a blind eye and refusing to investigate or stop the crimes to avoid being labelled "racist" or painting "migrants" in a bad light.

The UK government then voted against opening a full inquiry to investigate these crimes and find those responsible for covering them up.

If the rape and trafficking of horrific amounts of young women and even little girls isn't enough to inspire the masses to overthrow a tyrannical regime, there really isn't any hope left for the United Kingdom. The island that once conquered much of the world, ended the Trans-Atlantic slave trade, and ushered in a new era of prosperity has been reduced to a totalitarian state with its capital city now a Muslim-led shithole.

While the English are finally taking to the streets and demanding change, just like patriots in France, Germany, Canada, and others have done over the years, none of those countries has shown any significant sign of having the societal will and fortitude to change anything anytime soon, nor of being able to reform their rotten governments in the near future.

Europe's survival, just like it did some 70+ years ago, now hinges on the United States of America, though in a far different battle - if the US can successfully right the ship and once again show their dominance to the world, they can help shape the rest of the west, assisting the populist movements already underway in Europe that will then have proven solutions to galvanize its populations and begin their own sweeping reforms.

Up until now, despite clear advances, it's been slow-going in America - between political and legal minefields derailing the process with ridiculous amounts of red-tape and obstructionism, it seemed destined that, while some improvement would be made, it would be a temporary stop-gap until the next Democrat administration (or even a supposedly "central" Republican one) sent it all crashing back down.

The assassination of Charlie Kirk however, has unironically marked a turning point in that battle.

Many people who identified as left-leaning or "centrist" politically in the US were not only appalled with the assassination itself, but with the left's vile responses to it.

Not only did support for the left drop, which was already dwindling, but it steeled the resolve of right-wingers and patriots, inspiring them to put aside their differences and unite against a common enemy - one whose evil has been brought into the spotlight for all to see.

Nearly 300,000 people gathered together for Kirk's memorial event in Arizona, with millions more watching around the world, whether on cable networks, streaming services, or social media.

Not only was it about the great man Charlie was, but the service, rightfully so given his dedication to his faith, was extremely focused on Christianity; something that has become clear in the last few weeks was how many lapsed (or never-before) religious people have decided to go back to church or join one following the events of the last few weeks.

This is a major shift that may, over time, prove to be the most vital force in successfully restoring western society.

You may be wondering why an unabashed atheist like myself would be promoting any religion - and while it is true I don't believe in any religion or god, over the years I have come to realize its importance in society.

In the last decade in particular, witnessing the incredibly quick collapse of societies as their shared values and ideals have fallen away, as so many across the west have, it makes it clear why religion has always been so vital to civilization.

Throughout recorded history, every successful civilization that existed for any meaningful length of time has been united by religion. That doesn't mean that everyone in that civilization believed in the same religion, but that they shared a religious base in which similar values were upheld.

From the ancient Sumerians to the Egyptians to the Roman Empire, religion has played a vital role in society - western civilization as it stands today, including both Europe and North America, were founded by Christians with deeply engrained values and laws derived from their faith, and it is that foundation which has allowed the west to prosper.

The heights that humanity has achieved in the last several centuries - from the drastic decline in poverty per capita (compared to hundreds of years prior), the elimination of slavery in the west, the incredible technological advancements, the freedoms and prosperity the western world has seen - are a byproduct of Christianity.

It certainly has its problems, and there have been plenty of Christians and supposedly Christian governments and churches that have committed acts of evil, but those very acts are condemned by Christian holy texts themselves (unlike a certain other religion) and are a byproduct of humanity's nature itself, something that no religion or group can entirely avoid.

Yet the good Christianity has done long-term, that is something unique that nothing else has been able to replicate or even come close to.

The moral base it provides, the freedoms it espouses, the sense of community it seeks to foster, and the values it instills that guides civilization toward greatness.

What some have seemed to have forgotten however, is that it also instills a duty to protect not only their own, but all innocent people - regardless of what faith or creed they belong to, and to obey the laws of the land in which they find themselves.

It is effectively a guidebook for people in a civilized society to follow; now contrast this with Islam.

If you are not familiar with the teachings of Islam, know that, like Christianity, it preaches to protect innocent life and that it is against Islam to harm innocents.

Except..."innocent" is defined explicitly in Islam, as specifically being a Muslim and believer in Allah.

Anyone who is not Muslim is therefore not innocent, and anything is permitted against them. This is not a twisting of words, or a view shared by a fringe minority of believers in this religion - it is the explicit teachings of Islam, one in which you can read yourself in the Quran, and a view that is shared by the vast majority of Muslims worldwide.

Not only that, but it even permits violence against innocents (ie. other Muslims who have done nothing against the religion) if it is done to further the spread of Islam, with those harmed being celebrated as martyrs for the cause.

That is why terrorism is so widely supported in Islam - according to their own rules, terrorists have not gone against the teachings of Islam. Even those who wouldn't commit such acts themselves, largely approve of such acts, as evidenced by a plethora of surveys (many even done by left-leaning organizations that try and support Muslims) across the Middle East and amongst Muslims in the west over several decades.

If anything, the minority of Muslims that are against terrorist acts and the antiquated barbarity that Islam promotes, are the actual "extremists" given they need to twist their religion's words in order to try and justify (in Islamic context) their views - if they aren't simply lying in order to deceive others into believing Islam isn't the barbaric drivel it is (which is also explicitly allowed and encouraged, as virtually anything is permitted so long as it's to spread Islam).

Now Islam does of course promote a strong sense of shared values, as horrendous as most of those values may be - unlike Christianity, it tells followers quite explicitly, not to follow the rules of the land, unless those rules are of course what Islam preaches.

Any rules imposed by non-Muslims, are only to be followed in so much as to, once again, advance the cause of Islam - ie., follow them to pretend to be a good citizen, until you have enough friends beside you in order to impose Islam and its rules on everyone.

It's a stark contrast in morality and it shouldn't take a genius to figure out which system benefits humanity and which has been a blight on it since its inception, but here we are.

Of course, one doesn't need a religion to have strong morals and a sense of purpose, yet it has become clear that without those entrenched values (even in the non-faithful, but who have grown up having those values instilled in them), much of a population will increasingly be pulled in different and far less productive directions, fracturing society as they do so.

Religion is by far the most effective form of keeping a civilization running and together, and Christianity in general has proven to be the best form of it when it comes to benefitting and advancing humanity as a whole, and will be until (or if) something ever comes along that manages to do a better job.

In more modern times, there have been insidious attempts to replicate this cohesion not through a "spiritual" means the way religion does, but to instead adopt a state-facilitated form of control meant to replace religion entirely.

Karl Marx, as evil as he may have been, was no fool - he understood the power of religion and in designing his communist ideology, created his own kind of bastardized, quasi-religion.

In it, he appealed to people's idealistic nature to give them something to aspire to and instill a form of shared values, substituting deities with political figures (the leader effectively takes on the air of a God), and most importantly for his ideology, casting any who do not share their views as purely evil enemies.

This can be seen prominently today with the modern left - worshipping of political figures, idealistic, black-and-white views of the world that do not reflect reality, the ostracization of anyone who dares not share their views.

Places like China and North Korea, which are atheist states, practice this style of governance to keep their society functioning - replacing religious figureheads with their political leaders and enforcing a strict state-run form of pseudo-religion.

I may not be religious myself, but I have read the Bible, the Quran, and have an above-average knowledge of history - and with that knowledge of history, it becomes extremely clear that one religion in particular has allowed and facilitated western civilization's success.

Christianity may not be perfect, but it is effectively the "secret" weapon against the forces society faces today.

After Charlie Kirk's memorial, that return to Christianity gives many hope that there is a possibility to cleanse the rot which has taken hold of our nations.

A new Crusade may not have been officially declared, but for millions in America, a spiritual Crusade has begun in earnest - a battle fought not for land or glory, but for the very soul of the nation.

When I refer to the Crusades however, many know little about what they actually were.

Most know they were a series of holy wars launched by Christianity, but western education, by and large, pins most of the blame on Christians, painting them as the "bad guys" while almost completely ignoring the conditions of what led to them being deemed necessary in the first place.

The Crusades officially kicked off in 1095 AD, yet the reason for their desperate bid for reclamation took shape hundreds of years earlier - with the formation of the highly militant, politically organized religion of Islam.

Following their "prophet" Muhammad's death in 632 AD, Arabian tribes would soon be unified under Islam and their armies rapidly expanded under promises of spiritual rewards and material gains.

The Christian-led Byzantine Empire, the eastern continuation of the mighty Roman Empire, was by that time exhausted from decades of war, economic strain, and internal strife, thus it quickly lost territory to Muslim forces.

To minimize resistance and encourage conversion, conquered Christians were allowed to keep their faith in exchange for paying a tax. Over the next few centuries however, large swaths of Christian land was conquered by Muslim forces, including by the Seljuk Turks in the 11th century, who desecrated Christian holy sites and restricted pilgrims from accessing Jerusalem, a land that had been shared by various religions for centuries prior despite it being under Christian rule.

By 1095, Muslims had conquered Spain, Egypt, Syria, North Africa, and more. Christians were subjugated under Muslim rule, with access to "Holy Lands" being denied entirely - thus Pope Urban II launched the First Crusade, urging Christians to retake their Holy Land and defend Christendom and their way of life before it was wiped out in the Middle East entirely.

This rallying cry united both nobles and peasants alike, and thus "began" a holy war that, in truth, had started centuries prior.

The early Crusades saw surprising success as Christians took back parts of the Middle East even in battles against long odds, but over the next few centuries, those victories dwindled - logistical hurdles like having lengthy supply lines from Europe while Islamic armies had such supplies readily available, deteriorating coordination, and the influence of greed over what the Crusades had initially been about meant the Crusades eventually resulted in failure.

When the Crusades were officially over, Christianity still had no control over its Holy Land, and the Middle East was more Islamic than when it began, despite the immense bloodshed the holy wars had cost.

It did however, succeed in one crucial area - solidifying the Christendom of Europe.

The Crusades, even long after they ended, united Europe and reinforced the importance of maintaining Christianity as the vital core of European society. It also highlighted the dangers that Islam presented.

Islamic attempts to break into Europe had some success before the Crusades - the Umayyad Caliphate for instance had invaded the Iberian Peninsula and established a Muslim Spain by 718 AD, while the Aghlabids conquered parts of Italy by 902 - but further attempts would largely be put on hold during the Crusades as they fought to hold their own territories.

Following the Crusades, Europe faced several attempts by Islamic forces to establish a foothold in Christianity's stronghold, most notably from the mighty Ottoman Empire. Figures like Vlad the Impaler would slow the Ottoman advances, but the Ottomans would eventually conquer Constantinople and threaten Eastern Europe as a result.

This galvanized Europe as a whole to organize better defenses against the encroaching threat, with a siege of Vienna being repelled by a coalition of Habsburgs and Germans in 1529 while later that century in the Mediterranean, a "Holy League" was formed - a coalition of Spain, Venice, and the Papal States - which subsequently demolished the Ottoman's fleet, ending their aspirations of dominance in the Mediterranean.

A second siege of Vienna was attempted in 1683 as again the Ottomans tried to break into central Europe, but once again a Christian coalition beat them back, pushing them further out and putting an emphatic end to their plans of an Islamic Europe - at least for a few centuries.

While many in today's society loathe "colonialism" and the like, Islam continues to spread to this day using the same strategies utilized since its founding.

The religion retains many barbaric remnants of the past, such as the promotion of incest and child marriage, despicable treatment of women, and the view of non-Muslims as sub-human - it also quite plainly explains how Muslims are to take over other cultures and nations, imposing their own values over all others.

For many however, Islamic expansionism, and foreign replacement in general, despite being a rapidly increasing problem, doesn't seem existential.

Yet anyone who lives in an area that has rapidly increased in foreign "migrants" over the past decade, whether they be Muslim or not, can see the problem - radically increasing crime rates (particularly violent crime and crimes against women), loss of social cohesion and respect, stripping of social norms and shared values, failing economies - it hits all the markers for a collapsing civilization.

The entire "melting pot" theory countries like Canada were founded on, which ironically was derided by the creator of the term as being a farce that would inevitably fail, only works when you're dealing with very small numbers of outsiders coming in, or from very similar cultures that already share the same/similar values.

The very premise is a logical fallacy - the idea that all cultures and religions are equal.

Even those that preach such an absurdity don't believe it - just give them a few examples to ponder.

If all groups are equal, then the Nazis are just as good as Buddhist monks in Tibet. Al Qaeda and your local church choir? Totally equal communities, neither is better or more evil than the other.

It is a completely illogical and silly notion, yet it is one preached to this day - and the modern left has even turned it to an opposite extreme, where transgressions made by "white people" (such as slavery in the USA, or Europe's colonization of other countries) mean that we cannot celebrate our past cultural achievements, yet others who have a far darker past, can freely - just look at Mexican pride placed in the Aztecs, who brutally sacrificed countless innocent people including children (not just killing them, but torturing them as pain was a fundamental part of their rituals).

In small numbers, even those from more "diverse" cultures (outside of those of the Islamic faith) tend to assimilate and adopt the norms they become used to.

If those numbers grow however, assimilation goes out the window, and soon, those that claim to have come to your country to escape the conditions of their homeland, will actively force the conditions of their homeland upon you.

Just look at countries like Egypt or Syria for examples of what Christians (or anyone who refuses to convert to worshipping Islam's pedo prophet) have to look forward to when "moderate" Muslims outgrow the native populations.

While charlatans today cry about "genocide" of a terrorist state that has somehow still managed to vastly grow in population, multiple, real genocides of millions took place from Islamic forces just in the last century, when the Ottoman Empire targeted millions of Assyrian Christians, Armenians, Greeks, and more before being dismantled following the war.

More recently? The Middle East and even Africa has seen far more death at the hands of Muslims in the past few decades alone than if Israel was to literally turn all of Gaza and the West Bank into a nuclear wasteland.

That's not even mentioning the millions of people that are actively enslaved by Muslims that receive no press coverage while our own societies are openly criticized for having slaves hundreds of years ago, when virtually every society in the world viewed it as normal.

Even now, in areas that haven't had to deal with a flood of Muslims, similar social breakdowns are occurring, such as in Canada with its astounding influx of Indians that has rapidly plunged the country into a barely-functioning joke.

While recent "migrants" from India may not have the more sinister intentions of the Islamic faithful, they still produce similar results - rapid decline in a country's success and social norms.

In places like Canada and the UK, you can literally see what it looks like to witness a first-world country devolve into a third-world cesspit in a matter of years - and it was entirely brought on by ourselves.

The level of naivete and lack of self-respect to let this happen is astounding, but it isn't simply that - just like the collapse of the Roman Empire, it was brought on by an era of ease and ignorance.

Warnings from past generations were ignored, as modern society saw what came before as antiquated and "uneducated" - rather than dealing with reality, idealized fictions of how the world works flourished and created a populace ignorant of the threats that exist outside of their self-absorbed bubble.

The lack of clear threats and societal pull toward self-absorbtion also encouraged more and more to "escape" from religion, with many soon questioning the very values that enabled the comparative prosperity and privileges they were raised under.

As large parts of our own society systematically tore down the very values it was founded on and devolved into self-obsession, greed, and perversion, it welcomed outside threats with open arms, a populace so set on being virtuous it forgot the dangers it had grown up shielded from.

Western leaders (both in politics and business) on the other hand, while rarely competent, are typically not as naive as they portray, but are instead predominantly short-sighted opportunists, taking advantage of easy political power and cheap labour while ignoring the costs to their own society - especially when they are shielded from the costs they incur.

Just as the ruling class always has, they generally believe they are insulated from the damage they cause (and take great pains to do so), so by the time they are called on to pay the piper, it's usually long after they've died of old age or while they're hiding out far from the scene of the crime.

The problem is, generations of that kind of leadership has brought us to the brink of collapse - within two decades, western civilization has gone from arguably being at its height to teetering on a knife-edge between resurgence and self-immolation.

That is why a new Crusade was inevitable. A return to the values that shaped the west is paramount - not only to restore a once-great civilization, but to purge itself of the rot that it has let seep in.

While most think of a Crusade as a bloody, brutal war, this new Crusade (hopefully) will not need to be.

At least not like in medieval times.

It has already been bloody - from left-wing terrorism and assassinations to the BLM riots to massive amounts of rape brought on by foreign "invaders" across western societies, blood and innocence has already been spilled in abundance.

Yet America is already showing how to get back on track, starting with the protection of its borders and the expelling of foreign invaders, a remarkably effective way of preventing *checks notes* being invaded. Who would have thought?

This Crusade needs more than that to be effective however, or else it will just be a temporary lapse in the path we were on already.

It needs to be a continuation of what last Sunday was - a renaissance of the heart of western civilization; the restoration of the shared values on which our nations were founded.

This Crusade will not be just against Islam or even non-assimilating "migrants" in general - it must be fought for the very soul of our nations.

Not only does it need to bring justice to those who have encouraged the self-immolation of our own societies, which will be crucial in restoring our nations, but it also needs to reverse the worrying trend that threatens to collapse the west even if the last two decades of invasion had never happened.

Birth rates across western nations have been systematically demolished, whether it be via the self-defeating"feminist" movements over time, the tearing down of the nuclear family both in spirit and economically, or the economy in general (which, ironically, for third-world nations rarely presents such a predicament).

In order to sustain (not grow, just sustain) a nation's population, the birth rate needs to be about 2.11 - that's 2.11 live births per woman.

Currently that number is less than 1.6 in America, and under 1.3 in Canada - across Europe, the average is under 1.4, with some countries like Spain and Italy below 1.2. Even the highest European countries, like France, are only around 1.8, still far below a sustainable level.

Compare that to Islamic countries, particularly those with strong "extremist" elements. As of 2023: Afghanistan - 4.8. Yemen - 4.6. Pakistan - 3.6. Iraq - 3.2. Palestine, which is not a real country but instead a terrorist-run "state" - 3.3 (weird how they claim to be suffering from a "genocide", yet their population has steadily grown for decades).

And those that come to Europe and North America often trend even higher, just like many other third-worlders who settle in the west.

The "great replacement theory" which for so long has been slandered as nothing but racist hyperbole? It is literal, undeniable fact.

It is deemed that white people have always been a minority in the world, yet in 1900 they made up over 35% of the world's population; by 1950, it was about a quarter; today, estimates put it at about 15%.

Oddly, bringing up these facts is seen as "white supremacy" or somehow racist.

For some bizarre reason, white people are not allowed to celebrate their culture or advocate for it to be preserved, while any other races are actively encouraged to promote theirs and celebrate accomplishments of their race.

It's especially ironic given that it's nations founded and maintained by white people, that people from all different races flock to and take advantage of, while enjoying technology and advancements cultivated by white people, while at the same time denigrating white people as being "oppressors".

This acceptance of racism and the allowance of European culture and values to be erased threatens our very way of life in a way that hasn't been seen in many centuries.

The threat is very real, as is the threat of becoming just another Muslim nation (added to the list of 57 current ones).

Given Islam's political slant, Muslims overwhelmingly support their own candidates in political ridings and have mastered the art of taking over foreign government bodies politically - just ask residents of London, England or even Dearborn, Michigan.

As I've covered in the past, Islam is not like other religions, nor is it in any way compatible with any other set of values - it was designed as a militant, political doctrine that, like a cancer, quietly accumulates before systematically shutting down and eventually killing its hosts.

If things don't change rather drastically in the near future, within a few decades western nations such as Canada, Italy, Germany, France, and more will be under Islamic occupation without any war being declared - except of course, by Muslims, who have been actively waging "jihad" on the west for centuries as their religion demands.

This is where the new Crusade is not just about expelling the rot in our nations and protecting our way of life - but it needs to be a revitalization of western ideals and values to shield itself from falling for the same old tricks, and importantly, that revitalization also needs to restore the family unit.

Even if every illegal migrant (or "invited" migrant/refugee as is the case in many countries like Canada, England, etc.) was deported tomorrow and Islam was banned from practice, without fixing the loss of social cohesion in our ranks and returning our populations to a sustainable rate, we are just biding time until we inevitably are overrun.

History has already shown us there is a way to do such a thing - and it is through Christianity, the same system that western civilization was founded on.

While America takes the lead on turning back the invasion, the spiritual revolution that will be vital to any sustained success can be seen on full display in Poland today.

Poland has been through one hell of a lot over the last century - it was only a few decades ago that the Soviets were expelled from the nation, leaving their country in tatters.

If one were to say Poland would be one of the most successful countries in Europe a few decades ago, most would have laughed them out of the building.

Yet while the rest of Europe has welcomed scores of "migrants" and eschewed their values, Poland instead turned into their faith following the Soviet's leaving in 1993.

They secured their borders and refuse all "asylum seekers" and non-European refugees; they proudly declared themselves a Christian nation, heavily promoting the religion along with the restoration of its old churches and public squares; they invested in manufacturing and local workforces, making them the top manufacturer in Europe today outside of the far-larger country of Germany; and while other European countries adopted the Euro, Poland believed in themselves and kept their own currency, saving them much of the headaches from the collective failures Europe has been experiencing.

They proudly boast of the fact that they have not been the victims of any major terror attacks, something that virtually no other western nation can claim, and certainly no other with even a remotely large population can - and they also haven't seen the incredible increase in violent crime and particularly rape that the rest of the west has experienced in the last decade or two.

Unfortunately, they too struggle with a terribly low birth rate, but unlike the rest of Europe, that's the only existential threat they currently have to tackle - they don't have to worry about the large number of terrorists and terrorist-supporters in their midst, nor do they have a deluge of third-world people actively turning their once-beautiful country into a trash heap.

Their spiritual resolve, if it can be paired with true economic prosperity that only a western resurgence can provide, can undoubtedly turn the tide on their birth rate crisis and put them in the perfect position to see a level of success Poland never has before, all because they embraced their heritage and shared values instead of allowing it to be diluted or replaced.

The Crusades were too late and too disorganized to save the Middle East from Islamic rule - now, it is vital this new Crusade not only shifts into high gear to make up for lost time, but that the west sets itself up to ensure that the younger generations understand their role and how vital they are to our civilization's survival.

And so the playbook is simple: expel the invaders; restore the values that built our great civilization; hold accountable and punish those that facilitated our downfall to make certain it will not be allowed to happen again; banish Islam from the west, educating all to its insidious nature and barbarity, and restore western Christendom; and re-dedicate to the family unit to sustain our societies for generations to come.

If we can accomplish those tasks, western civilization can be restored to its former glory, and usher in an even more prosperous era than we have ever seen.

If we can't, then we are simply witnessing the final gasps of a dying civilization, replaced not by a greater force but by a cancerous rot we failed to stop from spreading.

The reinvigoration of Christendom, the restoration of the sanctity of marriage and family, and the return to our shared values and principles were what Charlie Kirk dedicated his life to - while his fight may now be over, his sacrifice has brought together millions around the world to join in the battle for the very soul for our civilization. May we come together in time to make it count.

Deus vult.